Many claim it is,
especially Neo-Pagans, who now use it freely for their own purposes. Some Christians, especially fundamentalists,
are terribly afraid that they might be right and want nothing to do with it if
it is tainted by Pagan associations. But the vast majority who use the Celtic
Cross are Christian and unconcerned that there is any controversy.
All the historical
examples of actual "Celtic Crosses" are from indisputably Christian
contexts. The Aberlemno Stone in Angus, the great High Crosses at Clonmacnoise,
Monasterboise, Kells, Iona and many other medieval monastic sites are all clearly
made in Christian times, under Christian patronage and according to
conventional Christian iconography. So where does this claim of paganism come
from?
Henry O'Neill, in his
1857 book Illustrations of the Most Interesting of the Sculptured Crosses of
Ancient Ireland writes, "I think that ancient Irish art was pagan, and was
continued during the Christian period, just as the peculiar form of the Irish
cross is pagan, or as the names of the months, or of the days of the week are
pagan; these, and a great deal more of paganism, having continued, owing to the
tenacity with which a people retain their general habits and ideas."
O'Neill was not himself
pagan, as much of his writing contains a Christian piety that would refute such
a suggestion. Rather he is expressing pride in a noble antiquity for Irish art.
During the 19th century Celtic Revival, much was said and written about native
cultural survivals from pre-Christian times. "Pre-Christian" would
also be pre-Norman and pre-English domination. It must be remembered that at
this time Ireland was reinventing itself. The trauma of famine and foreign rule
was fresh. Many ancient Gaelic myths and legends were revived to serve the
cause of a renewed sense of national identity and pride in the past.
A renewed interest in
Celtic Christianity was part of this movement as well. The Celtic Church refers
to the Church as it was in Ireland and Great Britain in the early medieval
times, when it was considered isolated from Rome and developed a distinctly
Celtic spirituality. People are not of one mind about this, as they rarely are
about religious matters. But one thing that came out of this was the belief by
some that the pagan Druidic religion of the Celts had clairvoyantly anticipated
the Gospels. Legends were retold and refashioned in the light of emerging ideas
and theories from archeology and anthropology. The similarity of the Celtic
Cross to ancient symbols such as various Sun symbols and the swastika rather
firmly established the notion that these pre-Christian signs were prototypes of
the Christian Celtic Cross. The mystics of the movement added this
archeological interpretation to their conviction that God had blessed the
Druids with prophetic knowledge of the coming of Christ.
Some observers see any
quartering of a circle as a Celtic Cross. The chambers of the Neolithic tomb at
Newgrange or the arrangement of standing stones. Examples like these, though
they be easily dismissed as coincidence, are "proof" to some that the
Celtic Cross is of greater antiquity than Christianity and obviously originally
pagan. Setting aside the question of validity of that belief, let us see what
"spin" has been put on that belief in modern times. To the Celtic
Christian of the early 20th century, the pagan roots of the Celtic Cross were a
source of joy and wonder. It is evidence of the enlightenment and spiritual sensitivity of their pagan
ancestors and of God's grace towards them.
Today you are more likely to hear the story told that the (bad)
Christians stole the symbol from its rightful pagan heritage and that this
appropriation was done with the sinister motives of tricking the convert by
changing the meaning of familiar symbols so that his conversion might require
less coercion.
Ironically, the Pagan
Roots of the Celtic Cross is essentially a Christian legend in its development.
It is only in the last quarter of the 20th century that the "Christians
stole it" spin of the story has become widespread, promoted mainly by
those who make no secret of their distrust of Christianity. But there is more
irony yet. The negative version of the story is also spread by some Christians,
who unaware of the Celtic Revival version, believe the Neo-Pagan version of the
story as true and feel compelled to spread the alarm, lest their fellow Christians
unwittingly offend God by use of a pagan symbol.

So my message is
"lighten up!" If you are
Christian or Pagan I hope this little essay helps answer some questions.
Attempts to deny or taint the Christian heritage of the Celtic Cross are
misguided, but it is also a mistake to insist that any faith has an exclusive
claim on this powerful symbol. And remember to keep things in perspective. The substance of religion is faith and love,
not symbols.
Stephen Walker
6 October 2002
No comments:
Post a Comment